Adventist Online

As inquiries have been coming into our office about the relationship of Daniel Mesa with Secrets Unsealed, we feel that a word of clarification is in order. 
The marketing department of Secrets Unsealed hired Daniel Mesa on May 27, 2014, however, on December 6, 2016, the ministry terminated Daniel’s employment for a variety of reasons. 
We would like to make it clear that neither Pastor Bohr nor anyone else at Secrets Unsealed shares Daniel’s theological views of the Godhead, particularly his understanding of the personhood and nature of the Holy Spirit, which we believe are at odds with Scripture, and the Spirit of Prophecy. Matthew 28:18-20 and 2 Corinthians 13:14 (among many other verses) indisputably teach that there are three distinct persons in the Godhead each in unity with the other and that all three are God in the highest sense. Ellen White is likewise clear: 
“There are three living persons of the heavenly trio. In the name of these three powers, the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost, those who receive Christ by living faith are baptized, and these powers will cooperate with the obedient subjects of heaven in their efforts to live the new life in Christ.” Bible Training School, March 1, 1906
Although we can see the work and fruit of the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of Prophecy has warned us not to delve into forbidden paths such as trying to explain the Holy Spirit’s nature—what or who He is:
“The nature of the Holy Spirit is a mystery. Men cannot explain it, because the Lord has not revealed it to them. Men having fanciful views may bring together passages of Scripture and put a human construction on them, but the acceptance of these views will not strengthen the church. Regarding such mysteries, which are too deep for human understanding, silence is golden.” Acts of the Apostles, p. 52
Secrets Unsealed likewise teaches that Jesus is the Divine Son of God, co-substantial with the Father and sharing His nature. Our position is that Jesus is God in the highest sense, a person distinct from the Father yet equal with Him, in unity with Him, and sharing with Him all the divine attributes. We do not believe that Jesus was created at any point in eternity past for in Him is life ‘original, unborrowed, underived.’

Views: 2041

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

James let me remind you what the new testament says about the new covenant:  

Heb 8:7 For if that first covenant had been faultless, then should no place have been sought for the second.
Heb 8:8 For finding fault with them, he saith, Behold, the days come, saith the Lord, when I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel and with the house of Judah:
Heb 8:9 Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day when I took them by the hand to lead them out of the land of Egypt; because they continued not in my covenant, and I regarded them not, saith the Lord.
Heb 8:10 For this is the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel after those days, saith the Lord; I will put my laws into their mind, and write them in their hearts: and I will be to them a God, and they shall be to me a people:

Please do not give us the crybaby act about us judging you you have condemned some of us to hell many times. 

Peace



James wrote: "You are in error: 1. Jesus Christ finished the law, I already addressed that."



Brother James, like brother Jason said, the only Christians I know who says the Ten Commandments are finished or done away with are the JW's... It is you who is in error, on this subject and many more.



1 John 3:4 Whosoever committeth sin transgresseth also the law: for sin is the transgression of the law.



Do you believe sin is no more, that it's impossible for us to sin? Well, if you believe there is no Ten Commandments for us to observe, then you believe there is no sin. You talk about error, geesh... Satan likes that type of teaching James.


Brother James, it's obvious you have different beliefs, contrary to what most Protestant Churchs teach, they believe the Ten Commandments weren't done away with... But you seem to march to a beat of a different drum, and have your own doctrines... I know, I know... you don't think that is the case, but it's been proven most of what you post is not true.



Bless!

James you remind me of the JW's stance on the Ten Commandments 

Yes I have seen how the JW keeps shifting their doctrines their own literature is their worst witness against them. Seems to me that brother James has the same problem here. 

SDA has shifted their doctrine on the trinity and created and added to the fundamental beliefs, have they not? When one finds error or misunderstandings, then beliefs should change to fit the truth. But most often churches and denominations that were better in the early days decline and become less about truth and more about the money and holding power over people, numbers of converts and baptisms and how many attend the church etc.

They have indeed James, may I ask what your problem with this is???

Peace



James wrote: "SDA has shifted their doctrine on the trinity and created and added to the fundamental beliefs, have they not? "



What was the shift? The only thing I see is the use of the word trinity. However the definition has remained the same. Brother James, this trinity smoke screen has been debunked... Brother Dan and Rush believes what SDA teach and has always taught. The beef is with the use of the word trinity. For me, the Bible doesn't use the word, and not that it means anything to you, but EGW didn't use the word trinity.... so I won't use it. There is no error in the SDA definition of the word trinity.



Bless!

Reasoning I am not to sure about no change Many came to the SDAC with many different ideas about the nature of God. The Fundamentals was evolving in the early years. The SDAC did not come out as picture of perfection and even now there are things that we have not got ironed out. 

Peace


Ian wrote: "Reasoning I am not to sure about no change Many came to the SDAC with many different ideas about the nature of God. The Fundamentals was evolving in the early years. The SDAC did not come out as picture of perfection and even now there are things that we have not got ironed out"



Oh... Ok, let's dig into it... What was the shift? What changed with the definition of the GODHEAD in the SDA Church?


Besides the use of the word trinity I see nothing... But I can be wrong, that's why we come together and discuss things brother Ian. Let me know what wasn't iron out.



Blessings!

Thank for your reply Reasoning I was not so much thinking about the Godhead, and more about the members that did not believe the Holy Spirit was fully God. And they were in Good company James White himself did not think the Holy Spirit was fully God. As we see here on this board we still have members that have problem with the Holy Spirit. 

So the shift was that the SDAC finally accepted the Holy Spirit as part of the Godhead. And over the years we have seen things being Added to the fundamentals. Not that I have any problems with that, but I believe we should be honest enough to admit that the SDAC did not come fully formed  from God we had a lot of learning and growing to do over the years. 

As I understand it we are a evolving faith and we need to be prepared to admit that even to our friend James who was rightly pointing out that our church has seen some changes. 

Sadly James did not care to answer to what his problem is with a church that is growing. 

Peace


Ian wrote: "I was not so much thinking about the Godhead, and more about the members that did not believe the Holy Spirit was fully God. And they were in Good company James White himself did not think the Holy Spirit was fully God. As we see here on this board we still have members that have problem with the Holy Spirit."
"So the shift was that the SDAC finally accepted the Holy Spirit as part of the Godhead. "



Thank you brother Ian.. Ok, so your saying the 7th day Adventist conference didn't believe what EGW confirmed in her writings of what the Bible teaches?


Mr. & Mrs. White didn't agree on this subject at one point, and then eventually James White dropped his false belief and agreed with his wife?


Where can I find that info? You have references I can go to and check it out?


Just to make sure I understand you correctly, your saying there was contention over whether or not the Holy Spirit was fully GOD, and then at a certain time, those (SDAC, James White and others) who believed the Holy Spirit wasn't fully GOD changed their view or shifted their view to the correct understanding that the Holy Spirit is fully GOD. Is my understanding correct brother Ian?

Again, if you can direct me to that info I would appreciate it.. What year did this shift take place? Thank GOD the SDA Church did come together.



Blessings!
1 Corinthians 12: 28 God has appointed in the church first of all apostles, second prophets, third teachers, then those who perform miracles, those who have gifts of healing, those who help others, administrators, and those who speak various kinds of languages.

29 Not all are apostles, are they? Not all are prophets, are they? Not all are teachers, are they? Not all perform miracles, do they?

30 Not all have the gift of healing, do they? Not all speak in foreign languages, do they? Not all interpret, do they?

31 Keep on desiring the better gifts. And now I will show you the best way of all.

RSS

Site Sponsors

 

Adventist Single?
Meet other Single
Adventists here:
Join Free


USA members:

Support AO by
using this link:
Amazon.com

 

© 2017   Created by Clark P.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service