Adventist Online

Glendale City Church bans me from church property

January 26, 2014 Elizabeth Iskander

Last month I received a certified letter from the Glendale City Church stating that the Church Board had voted to disallow me from the premises. The letter states that if I come onto the church campus, I will be “regarded as a trespasser and the church will take appropriate actions, up to and including requesting law enforcement assistance.” The letter states that the GCC board took this action due to my “history of disrupting the congregational life of the church.” The wording is intended to imply that I have disrupted worship services or other church meetings, but I have done no such thing.
What I have done is to report, over the course of several decades, what I have seen and heard at GCC, and I don't think they've appreciated the exposure. I've had run-ins with two previous GCC pastors, Arthur “Rudy” Torres, who was senior pastor in the 1980s and is now retired (but is listed as “pastor emeritus” and serves as chairman of the church board), and Mitch Henson, who was senior pastor during the 1990s and 2000s, until he died of brain cancer six years ago.

The letter does not detail what they think I've done wrong and, frankly, I do not know what could have prompted the GCC Board and Pastor Todd Leonard, the current senior pastor, to take such extreme action. Leonard has only been in Southern California since May 2011, and has been pastor at GCC since October 2012, and was not a party to my previous conflicts with GCC. After giving it extensive consideration for the past few weeks, I believe that Leonard and his board sent the letter because of events that occurred surrounding a Los Angeles Adventist Forum meeting August 2012. Some background information is called for.
First, one must understand what is the Los Angeles Adventist Forum. In 1967, a group of Adventist professors and graduate students founded the “Association of Adventist Forums,” and a couple of years later, AAF began publishing the journal Spectrum (In 2007, AAF shortened its name to Adventist Forums, or AF.) AF sponsors not only the print journal, Spectrum, but also a website of the same name, which has become a hub of "progressive" Adventist opinion. In recent years, AF and Spectrum have been advocating three main policy goals for the Seventh-day Adventist Church: (1) acceptance of Darwinism/theistic evolution, (2) acceptance and normalization of homosexuality, and (3) female ordination and leadership. But, in addition to the journal and website, AF has long sponsored local Adventist Forum chapters around the country, which hold periodic meetings, lectures, and symposia. The Los Angeles Adventist Forum is one of these local AF chapters.
A second necessary background fact is that Glendale City Church has long been known as a homosexual-friendly church. Pastor Rudy Torres made GCC a gay-friendly church back in the 1980s (decades before Ryan Bell followed the same course at the Hollywood SDA Church). City Church was famous for having a section of pews—typically two or three rows—informally set aside for the use of the gay community. Pastor Mitch Henson continued, and even strengthened, Torres' gay-friendly policy. Upon Henson's passing, Spectrum ran an article praising him for being “a shepherd of tolerance,” and quoting Taylor Ruhl, president of Kinship International, an organization of Adventist homosexuals. (Kinship International formerly went by the name “Seventh-day Adventist Kinship,” and was sued by the official SDA Church after the Church trademarked “Seventh-day Adventist” and related terms). In the Spectrum notice of Henson's passing, Ruhl was quoted as saying:

Mitch Henson was among the most courageous pioneers of inclusion for LGBT Adventists, granting many of us membership in his church and welcoming those of us who could attend there into full participation in the life of the church. He served as a member of the Kinship Advisory Board.

Henson was so beloved by the gay community that the book, “Christianity and Homosexuality: Some Adventist Perspectives” was dedicated to him. The book was edited by Dave Ferguson, a prominent gay GCC member, Loma Linda professor David Larson, and La Sierra University theologian and past president Fritz Guy, and features an article by La Sierra theologian John Jones arguing that the biblical proscription on homosexual sex applies only to unequal, exploitative sex.
Last summer, I saw an advertisement in Spectrum for a forum meeting planned for August 22, 2013, at GCC. Rudy Torres was to give a talk on the history of GCC as a gay-friendly church, and his role in bringing that about, titled “From 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' to 'Thanks for asking Me to be an Elder.'” The implication was that homosexuals could now serve as elders, at least at Glendale City Church. I was well aware, however, that church policy prohibits gay elders. I telephoned Southern California Conference President Larry Caviness and asked if that policy had changed. Elder Caviness said the policy had not changed. Shortly after that conversation, I noticed that, in the Spectrum advertisement, the title of the planned presentation had changed to, “From Exclusion, to Inclusion, to Connection: The Glendale City Church Story.”

Later, I learned that Elder Caviness had met with Todd Leonard, and Leonard had agreed not to ordain any gay elders. But then I saw the GCC Nominating Committee report for 2013-2015 (Click image to enlarge and read). It listed Taylor Ruhl, a gay activist who had served as president of Kinship International, among the elders of the church. For Taylor Ruhl to be an elder meant that Todd Leonard must have been parsing his words to Elder Caviness when he promised not to ordain any homosexual elders: because Ruhl had been ordained an elder decades ago, when he was married to a woman (obviously before he came out as a homosexual) it was arguably not necessary to ordain him an elder. Again I contacted Elder Caviness, telling him this time that Taylor Ruhl was listed as an elder. Caviness told me that he had not intended to play word games; he meant that City Church should not ordain or have any gay elders. Can a conference president tolerate a pastor who is less than completely forthright in dealing with the conference office, and plays those kind of word games?

At the August 22 Forum meeting, during question time, I asked Rudy Torres why he changed the name of his talk from, “From 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell' to 'Thanks for Asking Me to be an Elder'” to “From Exclusion, to Inclusion, to Connection: The Glendale City Church Story.” Torres said that you should always name a book after you've written it, not before. I then asked if there were any gay elders at City Church. Torres deferred to Todd Leonard, who said that the Southern California Conference would not allow GCC to have gay elders. It thus seems that I might have thwarted Leonard and Torres' plans to have gay elders at GCC, and they want to make sure I'm never again in a position to expose their activities. That seems to be what their letter declaring me persona non grata is really about.

As noted above, this is not my first contretemps with GCC and its senior pastors. My conflict with GCC started with Rudy Torres back in the 1980s, and continued with Mitch Henson and now Todd Leonard. Usually—but not always—the point of contention was their attempt to make GCC the gay-friendly Adventist Church in the Los Angeles area.
Once, when Mitch Henson was pastor, Henson arranged for the Gay Men's Chorus of Los Angeles to give a concert at City Church. I reported this to the conference office and a storm of controversy broke out, eventually forcing Henson to move the Gay Men's Chorus concert to a non-Adventist venue. He never forgot my role in embarrassing him and thwarting his plans. A few years later, my daughter, who was in high school and enthusiastic about music, began singing in the City Church choir, then under the direction of Brenda Mohr who was also my daughter's music teacher at Glendale Adventist Academy. Naturally, I wanted to attend City Church when my daughter was singing there, but Henson, who apparently did not like me looking down on him from the balcony seat I preferred, insisted that I not attend. He communicated to me through an intermediary that if I insisted upon attending, my daughter would be kicked out of the choir. I relented and stayed away from City Church, even though I dearly wanted to watch my daughter sing. I wanted to donate stock valued at $500.00 to GCC's music program, but Mitch Henson refused my donation; I donated it to Glendale Adventist Academy's music department instead.

A couple of things about this latest incident merit comment. First, this is not proper procedure. Banning someone from the premises is comparable to, and in a way more extreme than, disfellowshiping, and disfellowshiping requires a church-wide business meeting, not a board meeting. It also requires that the “defendant” receive prior written notice of the business meeting, and be given an opportunity to be heard and produce witnesses in his or her own defense. (See, SDA Church Manual, Ch. 7 “Discipline”). The procedure by which I was purportedly banned from GCC is so defective and contrary to published SDA standards that I could probably sue and win. Moreover, I've been told by knowledgeable persons that even GCC's board meetings are not held on proper notice when anything controversial is up for vote, but actual notification is limited to the “progressive” coterie that runs the church.

City Church's procedure hasn't changed since 1990, when I had a previous run-in with Rudy Torres. On that occasion, Torres called me into his office, where an associate pastor was also present, stating, “We will disfellowship you if you continue what you are doing!” “What am I doing?” I asked. “You know what you are doing,” they replied. They refused to articulate what they thought I was doing, and said they had a group of elders who were in agreement with them, and that they would disfellowship me. “Will I be able to attend this little meeting?” I asked. “No!” “What about due process?” I asked. “The Glendale City Church has its own process,” they replied.
Second, this incident is another illustration of the fact that when liberals are in the minority, they plead for tolerance and a permissive, laissez-faire attitude. But where liberals are in the majority and control the levers of power, as they are and do at City Church, they are quick to use them to discipline and silence those who oppose their agenda. This is more than a pattern; it's a law, like gravity.

Third, I think Larry Caviness is a good leader and a solid Adventist, which makes it all the more puzzling why he feels compelled to hire and tolerate hyper-liberal pastors at City Church. Todd Leonard makes no secret of his liberal theology; his linked-in page states:

My Pastoral Priorities:

  1. Help people develop an intentional and actively compassionate lifestyle towards others, modeled on the life and teachings of Jesus
  2. Help college students and young adults navigate their spiritual journey out of fundamentalism through skepticism and into wholistic spirituality
  3. Develop church environments that enthusiastically embrace people with diverse belief systems, lifestyles and cultural practices
  4. Promote racial, gender and sexual equality and integration in all levels of denominational polity and practice”

Number 2 is interesting because anyone who has lately been following “progressive” Adventism knows that “fundamentalist” is their favorite pejorative for those of us holding traditional Seventh-day Adventist beliefs and a high view of Scripture. So on a public web page, Leonard is declaring his intent to bring our youth and young adults out of Adventism and into something called “wholistic [sic] spirituality,” whatever that is.
Number 3 is interesting because Leonard pledges to enthusiastically embrace diversity in “belief systems, lifestyles and cultural practices.” But Adventism has its own distinct belief system (the 28 fundamental beliefs) lifestyle (vegetarian, non-smoking, non-drinking, etc.) and sub-cultural practices (church attendance, Christian education, Christian sexual mores, etc.), and an important part of any Adventist pastor's job is to bring people into this Adventist faith and way of life.
Number 4 is interesting because “gender” equality means equality between the sexes, so “sexual” must refer to something different, presumably sexual orientation. Leonard seems to be saying that he wants to promote equality between heterosexuals and homosexuals “in all levels of denominational polity and practice,” which would explain why he is installing gay elders at GCC.
A few weeks ago, when news of Ryan Bell's “year-of-atheism” publicity stunt raced around the blogosphere, an Adventist in Tennessee posted the story on his Face Book page. He must have been Face Book “friends” with Todd Leonard, who commented on the post:

Atheism can mean different things...for some, it means that to put any parameters on the Divine (like a name or a characteristic) is to limit and devalue God. Of course it can also mean a rejection of anything other than the visible universe too. But I think he's exploring the gamut of thought on this. I am finding more and more agnostics and atheists to be very spiritual people. More mature, more thoughtful, more compassionate. It's very interesting for me to see.

The idea that acknowledging the existence of God limits or devalues Him is just as contrary to biblical revelation as rejecting anything other than the visible universe; both are equally opposed to the Adventist worldview. And the notion that agnostics and atheists are “very spiritual people, more mature, more thoughtful, more compassionate” speaks for itself, and speaks volumes about Todd Leonard's theology. Todd Leonard is not less liberal than Ryan Bell, yet he was hired as a senior pastor only five months before Bell was asked to resign. Something is wrong here.

Views: 952

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Todd Leonard's Overview

  • Senior Pastor at Glendale City Seventh-day Adventist Church
  • Pastor at Southern California Conference of Seventh-day Adventists

32 people have recommended Todd


500+ connections

Todd Leonard's Summary

My Pastoral Priorities:
1. Help people develop an intentional and actively compassionate lifestyle towards others, modeled on the life and teachings of Jesus
2. Help college students and young adults navigate their spiritual journey out of fundamentalism through skepticism and into wholistic spirituality
3. Develop church environments that enthusiastically embrace people with diverse belief systems, lifestyles and cultural practices
4. Promote racial, gender and sexual equality and integration in all levels of denominational polity and practice

Todd Leonard's Experience

Senior Pastor

Glendale City Seventh-day Adventist Church

October 2012Present (1 year 4 months) Glendale, California

Nonprofit; 201-500 employees; Religious Institutions industry

May 2011Present (2 years 9 months) Glendale, CA

2011-12: Young Adult Pastor, Vallejo Drive Church
2012-Current: Senior Pastor, Glendale City Church

Todd Leonard's Organizations

  • Communitas Congregations, Inc.

    Co-Founder and President
    • October 2013 to Present

    Communitas networks congregations and other faith groups in Northeast Los Angeles County for the purpose of relationship-building and collaboration to create better neighborhoods for all people

  • Adventist Peace Fellowship

    Member, Advisory Board
    • August 2013 to Present

    The Adventist Peace Fellowship (APF) is a non-profit lay organization that seeks to raise consciousness about the centrality of peacemaking to the beliefs and heritage of Seventh-day Adventists.

  • SDA Kinship

    Member, Advisory Council
    • April 2013 to Present
  • Southern California Conference

    Member, LA Metro Region Planning Committee
  • Southern California Conference

    Member, LA Metro Region Staffing Committee

... the failure of man's righteousness !

Trying to protect the church from a perceived trouble-maker, when the trouble-maker is actually sent by God.

You know, it always interests me that Jacob (in the original "Jacob's trouble") thought that Jesus was his enemy, and for hours-on-end Jacob fought for his life, until suddenly he realized that it was NOT an enemy he was wrestling with. He had had the whole situation back to front. I wonder how much of that will be our experience in the closing scenes.

Brother Stewart,

Thank you for your thought provoking comment. Indeed there may be many who will be called Troublers of Israel.

Just last evening I was reading the book "The Final Inquisition" the chapter entitled "Jesuit Infilatration Exposed" by Brother Danny Vierra.

Did you know he was disfellowshiped by the Galt SDA Church for daring to say to the late Dr Bacchiocchi

"I read your book and noticed that you never refer to the Lord's Day as the Seventh day, Saturday"


to which the Dr replied


"Very good observation young man, it doesn't"

the book Brother Danny was referring to was "Sabbath to Sunday" by Dr Bacchiocchi.

Brother Danny was accepted into the fellowship of the Sacramento Central SDA Church.

Troublers of Israel sent by the Lord surely, there will be more?

Many thanks


Interesting. Dr. Bacchiocchi was apostate at best and a Jesuit at worst. He tried to break ground regarding doing away with the 1260, SOP, and the papacy as being front and center. He never had an answer for the following question though I asked him about it many times. " Why if the little horn referred also to Islam, did Islam not rise up among the 10 horns?"  He talked about other things but would never reply to that because it shot down his claim.


This is an interesting and detailed example of abuse by the church, or at least by some of its officials. On the face of it, I find it curious that a member can be banned from church premises (an absolute act of intolerance) by persons who claim inclusivity in their pastoral ministry. Plainly, if gays can be called into the church and even made elders, why would the church officials inviting them be so intolerant to persons who see things differently? And to add insult to injury, they threaten to call law enforcement to keep out the "offending" church member? Not fair, not biblical and certainly very popish. Something is indeed wrong, although it is beginning to look more like a fulfillment of prophecy.

 If I was this woman I would be glad to be kicked off said premises. I'm not saying the Glendale church did was right, but the appropriate response shouldn't be to tattle tale every single thing that they do. First off prayer should be in order. Then several meetings on the direction the church is heading should take place. The church as a whole should participate and voice their opinions, not just blindly follow a leader. Again, I'm not defending GCC I'm just not sure what the woman did was the correct approach. In the end, she should view her ban as a blessing. She no longer has to put up with such a corrupt church, and her article will gather enough attention for change to actually happen.


So sorry to hear about the loss of your local church to the spirit of apostasy and the spirit of Babylon. There are some local churches among us that have fallen in the same way - but the denomination is moving forward not to be tied down by every wind of apostasy that arises from this or that one-off local congregation of misdirected, misguided, mislead souls.

What fellowship has light with darkness. These people knew you were not serving their master, the god of the world, and they needed you to go some place else and take your influence, your angels, your desire for faithfulness to God with you.

And the truth is that others in that church may only have stayed there - because they see you are still there and they know you have a heart for God. So if it is good for you to stay -- then maybe good for them to stay (or so they may be thinking).

Jesus said to shake the dust off of your feet when it reaches a certain point. Clearly you are there.

Just with those three...

(1) acceptance of Darwinism/theistic evolution, (2) acceptance and normalization of homosexuality, and (3) female ordination and leadership...

Its controversial enough to say nothing of whether its even scriptural...

Indeed it looks like the Church will fall but I find comfort in the quote from EGW 

The Church Does Not Fall,

In that day the remnant of Israel and the survivors of the house of Jacob will no more lean upon him that smote them, but will lean upon the Lord, the Holy One of Israel, in truth. A remnant will return, the remnant of Jacob, to the mighty God. Isaiah 10:20, 21, R.S.V.

In vision I saw two armies in terrible conflict. One army was led by banners bearing the world’s insignia; the other was led by the bloodstained banner of Prince Immanuel. Standard after standard was left to trail in the dust as company after company from the Lord’s army joined the foe and tribe after tribe from the ranks of the enemy united with the commandment-keeping people of God. An angel flying in the midst of heaven put the standard of Immanuel into many hands, while a mighty general cried out with a loud voice: “Come into line. Let those who are loyal to the commandments of God and the testimony of Christ now take their position. Come out from among them, and be ye separate.” ...

The battle raged. Victory alternated from side to side. Now the soldiers of the cross gave way, “as when a standardbearer fainteth” (Isaiah 10:18). But their apparent retreat was but to gain a more advantageous position. Shouts of joy were heard. A song of praise to God went up, and angel voices united in the song, as Christ’s soldiers planted His banner on the walls of fortresses till then held by the enemy. The Captain of our salvation was ordering the battle and sending support to His soldiers. His power was mightily displayed, encouraging them to press the battle to the gates. He taught them terrible things in righteousness as He led them on step by step, conquering and to conquer.

At last the victory was gained. The army following the banner with the inscription, “The commandments of God, and the faith of Jesus,” was gloriously triumphant.—Testimonies for the Church 8:41.

There are many doctrines current in our world. There is many a religion current that numbers its thousands and tens of thousands, but there is but one that bears the superscription and the stamp of God. There is a religion of man and a religion of God. We must have our souls riveted to the eternal Rock....

Satan will work his miracles to deceive; he will set up his power as supreme. The church may appear as about to fall, but it does not fall. It remains, while the sinners in Zion will be sifted out—the chaff separated from the precious wheat. This is a terrible ordeal, but nevertheless it must take place. None but those who have been overcoming by the blood of the Lamb and the word of their testimony will be found with the loyal and true, without spot or stain of sin, without guile in their mouths. We must be divested of our self-righteousness and arrayed in the righteousness of Christ.—Selected Messages 2:379, 380.


Site Sponsors


Adventist Single?
Meet other Single
Adventists here:
Join Free

USA members:

Support AO by
using this link:


© 2022   Created by Clark P.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service