I am not aware that Seventh Day adventists celebrate any of these kind of feasts....so how come some do?
Thank you Alexander. These offshoots sure do confuse people..but then I guess that's why satan uses them...I did not think the feasts were valid..but when I see things like that I feel that I must question..and re question things.
I do believe all of these offshoots should get their own name..seriously..they just want to play tag team with us because Seventh Day Adventist is widely known and they receive special privileges for Sabbath in the military etc..I guess thats why all these off shoots keep part of our name..or change it a little..and to deceive of course.
Wow..I checked out this offshoot...............http://www.everythingimportant.org/Walter_McGill/
I noticed one of the beliefs is............."That his group has achieved complete victory over known sins."
I guess I will let the site show whether he sins or not lol.
Let us consider again:
We remain yet free to consider all things no matter how ludicrous they at first sound to the ear, for whoever in a day gone by, did ever consider that a child could be born of a virgin?
Adventism is a system of restoration of the things of God.
I see your point Ron, but I am also aware that you seem to be viewing the "types and ceremonies" as too broad. Examine again if you will, and note that they point to the abolishing of the same animal sacrifices as stated in Hebrews.
It is in terms of the sacrifices, where type met antitype in the death of Christ, is it not?
We should note that it was this very Jesus that gave the law, judgments an statutes at Horeb Mal. 4; and stated at that time also, "for ever, throughout your generations". Was that just for the folks back then, or meant for modern Israel too?
Why do we reach down into Deut. 14:8 and eat no "swine", but seem to ignore many of the other items directly after it?
Yes Roland, Jesus has sweep away the sho;e system of types and ceremonies.
I gona tell you one thing are you awere that Walter is a Davidain Sevenday a.k.a Shepherd's Rod? The Shepherd's Rod also believe in type and antitype! Beware!
hey Benicio,i like readind n watching the work of Walter Veith,what do you mean he's a davidian would like to know more pliz,this my email@example.com
I'm afraid it's much worse, since last year about this time I accepted the Branch doctrine.
Regular Davidians don't generally keep the feasts.
Help here what is the defference in the Barnch and the regular Davidians.
Hey, about that type and antitype bit; so do EGW and the SDA pioneers.
Check it out.
How so? Though it is the popular position of Christian denominations, we might ask:
Besides that one EGW reference, what else may be used as support for the position you hold on the subject? I know that because we were raised and taught not to observe the Lord's holidays, it remains the more convenient choice. But we should not allow the fact of such to bias our judgement.
In time past, and while still under Egyptian slavery, God called the Hebrews to the observance of His Sabbath, and thereby things got a little worse for a moment. Yet, their obedience in that regard was a condition of them receiving further blessings from the Lord, and their release.
It will not take long for the one that takes a peak, to find that EGW calls the SDA, Israel -- and at that, for good reason. The promises pertain to us as a people, and in a sense, always had, for God knows all things.
So let me know if you can, as tradition counts for little while the timely truth is everything.
The truth is what we need, and we are advised to go to the "bottom" of these Bible topics.
Ellen White call the church Spiritual Israel, is a big defference.
You born Israelities, both you become a spiritual Israelities.
Any one can become a spiritual Israelities. You can never become a Jew, you born a jew. But as SDA people we became spiritual Israelities/Israel.
The point is, that one statement while seeming to "sum it up", when compared to the broader scope of what even the same writer has to say, may tell a different story.
One statement therefore is seldom good enough to go by.
The curtain was torn, but how will we prove that such did away with any portion of the law of God?
It can also, simply mean that the service moved from earth to heaven, where the High priest is gone, can it not?
Show me what are the statements of Paul, if you will.
Examine all sides fairly.