Posing the same question in a discussion that is going on elsewhere:
"I am admittedly not married yet (it's coming *smile*) but I believe there needs to be BOTH: A joint account for household expenses and bills and some money that is non-discretionary. However, I do believe that the personal account should have an agreed amount monthly (some might call it an allowance) and not be secret. What say you?"
Please read the article before you post!
Permalink Reply by BLESSLY on July 28, 2011 at 10:11am
Permalink Reply by OSING on July 30, 2011 at 9:52am
Permalink Reply by 'nuff sed on July 30, 2011 at 4:29pm
Permalink Reply by Gabriel Rodriguez de Espinoza on July 30, 2011 at 5:11pm
Permalink Reply by Ray Phillips on July 30, 2011 at 11:08pm OSING
Sorry to hear of your loss. We only had 38 years together when her life was cut short. But, it was a 38 year honeymoon, and I have many happy memories as a result. It would have been 47 for us this year. We both can look forward to meeting our loved ones in the morning.
Maranatha :)
Ray
Permalink Reply by Ray Phillips on July 30, 2011 at 11:03pm Sarah
What? you do not seem to realize is that when a man marries a woman, that this rule applies:
"What is mine is mine and what is thine is mine."
So obviosly, all would go into one account. Right? ROFL
Actually, we are much closer to agreement than it would appear. I do believe that as a general rule, all funds go under the control of one of the partners. There are exceptions to this. E.g. when I had a business, there were two or more accounts. One or more for the businesses and one for the home. At this point, I am only speaking of the household account.
There may even be multiple household accounts. But, to prevent confusion, I'll not go into that here. No matter how many are involved, one should be in the lead position as to how the money is spent. However, both partners should have access to the account(s). But, if the one who is not in the lead makes an expenditure, the one who is in the lead should be told about it. This in not a case of control, but of control. G The one who is in the lead in finances needs to know that the money has been spent, not so that they can control the other party.
The counsel that I give is this. As a couple gets to know each other, it usually becomes quite obvious as to who is the better money manager.
These are a few guidelines that I have recommended to all who have come to me for counsel in this area. I hope that it will help the one who reads this. For I know that it works.
Maranatha :)
Ray
Permalink Reply by Alexander on August 4, 2011 at 9:28pm I didn't read the article, but I like the idea you mentioned Sarah.
But, what happens when only one brings in money? Well, I still believe its best if both have money of their own.
God Bless, Alex.
Permalink Reply by Quacinda Jodyne Topkok on August 15, 2011 at 9:42pm
Permalink Reply by Kristina Pauly on January 23, 2012 at 8:08am @Quacinda
As a woman who has lost everything she owns and had to replace it all at least three times thanks to the man in my life at those times and having fully experienced exactly what you are talking about ( right down to the physical and emotional abuse for my x.) do not think it a good excuse for keeping things separate. In a worldly Godless relationship maybe but in a Christian marriage there is no cause to even consider such a thing unless of course you are bitter and jaded about how you were screwed over once before, which of course is a mindset completely opposed to the way God would have us think in the first place.
Permalink Reply by Quacinda Jodyne Topkok on January 23, 2012 at 11:45am Yes, 'knee-jerk' responses are not good.
Permalink Reply by Paul Macevle on January 5, 2012 at 1:23am © 2012 Created by Clark P.