This verse states that a woman shall not put that which pertaineth unto a man neither shall a man put on a woman's garment for all that do so are abomination unto the LORD thy God. So does it mean women must not put on trousers?
There have been nice styles of ladies pants and suits for a long time. I believe men would look silly in them. And men have clothes that would look weird on women. Though in the world there are many woman who will wear male intended clothing, including boots, etc.
I have personally seen people walking down the street that I had NO idea if they were male or female due to their hair and cothing.
I believe it's an abomination for the sexes to be so confusing you can't tell who is what! considering he made males quite different from females in body, and mind.
Your conclusion is faulty and incorrect, Nkosilathi--and so is whoever is preaching it in your country. The men wore dresses (robes) like the women in Bible times, but they were made for men. Did that lead to the moral decay as well? Men wear skirts (kilts) in Ireland and China--as well as kimonos--like the women. Does that cause sin there too? Of course not!
BUT HOW COME THOSE WOMEN DO NOT PUT ON THE SLACKS AT CHURCH. THEY ONLY PUT ON DURING THE WEEK BUT WHEN IT COMES ON SATURDAY THEY ARE EITHER IN SKIRTS OR DRESSES. SO THIS MEANS THAT TROUSERS, PANTS ARE NOT MEANT FOR WOMEN. I HAVE EVEN WATCHED THE HOPE CHANNEL TRYING TO FIND THAT, AS I THOUGHT PROBABLY ITS HERE IN AFRICA THAT TROUSERS/PANTS ARE NOT TOLERATED ON WOMEN. BUT I HAVE ONLY SEEN PENTECOSTAL CHURCHES DO THAT ONLY. WHY?????
WHAT ARE YOU SAYING MR. IGWE