I too find this ironic, considering that GC's stance against the Second Amendment, which you can find on their site. How then can they justify having armed guards if they are declaring the populous should not have the right to keep and bear arms. Further, how does this position not fly in the face of the concept of Liberty and preserving the Constitution?
It reminds me of Obama declaring the populous doesn't need a firearm for protection, yet he is protected by layers of people who carry them on his behalf.
Yes Myron, it does seem that SDA inc. worships the God of Forces/Fortresses. Babylonian to the core. Good post.
We are supposed to be non-violent.